Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Iannaccone vs David Pichler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Iannaccone vs Pichler analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Iannaccone vs David Pichler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Iannaccone 1 - 0 Pichler
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Iannaccone has won 49.22% of points on their second serve, while Pichler has won 49.9%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Iannaccone, in recent form, has won 54.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pichler has won 54.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.39% and 30.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Iannaccone has saved 55.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pichler has saved 58.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Iannaccone has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 42/ 32), with Pichler winning 47.54% (W/L 29/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Iannaccone has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 51/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Iannaccone has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16), where as Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Iannaccone winning 1 times and Pichler being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Iannaccone winning 2 and Pichler winning 1. The last match between Iannaccone and Pichler was at the M25 Rome, 30-05-2023, First, Clay with Federico Iannaccone getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Iannaccone and Pichler have played a deciding set 1 times, with Iannaccone winning 1 times and Pichler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Iannaccone winning 0, and Pichler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Iannaccone has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.41 while Pichler has played against players with an average rank of 190.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Iannaccone has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pichler has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Iannaccone has converted 50.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pichler has converted 44.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
486
Rank
474
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
587
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
53% (166-146)
Career Total W/L
56% (342-267)
56% (20-16)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Iannaccone VS Pichler H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Federico Iannaccone | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:27:0 | 3:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (67/109) | 65% (75/115) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (45/67) | 63% (47/75) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (15/42) | 38% (15/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (6/16) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (53/115) | 45% (49/109) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Iannaccone VS Pichler H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Federico Iannaccone
Player
David Pichler
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
49 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Iannaccone | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (20/16) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (47/38) | 52% (25/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (412/349) | 51% (221/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 38% (5/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:20 | 1:41:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 282.03 | 260.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1777/2479) | 63% (871/1388) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (1081/1777) | 68% (592/871) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (345/701) | 50% (258/517) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (156/306) | 45% (58/130) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1141/2522) | 40% (559/1402) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (16/10) | 44% (4/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (20/35) | 47% (9/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 10% (10/1) |
Federico Iannaccone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Federico Iannaccone
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
85%
(
71 of
84)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
68%
(
27 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Alexander Weis
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
6 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Federico Iannaccone
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Federico Iannaccone
76%
(
91 of
120)
1st Serve %
82%
(
77 of
94)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Federico Iannaccone
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Federico Iannaccone
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Daniele Minighini
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
72%
(
21 of
29)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
44%
(
12 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
47%
(
17 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
40
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Federico Iannaccone
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
David Pichler
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
16
Total Points Won
20
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Iannaccone Vs Pichler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
